Comments on: Galloway To See Action Sunday? http://www.steelersgab.com/2009/12/25/galloway-to-see-action-sunday/ The Definitive Pittsburgh Steelers Blog! Thu, 29 Jul 2010 11:01:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Mike http://www.steelersgab.com/2009/12/25/galloway-to-see-action-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-12143 Mike Fri, 25 Dec 2009 22:29:43 +0000 http://www.steelersgab.com/?p=2233#comment-12143 Merry Christmas Steeler Nation. Except for you Bruce Arians...bah frickin humbug to you. Merry Christmas Steeler Nation. Except for you Bruce Arians…bah frickin humbug to you.

]]> By: Stephen Rhodes http://www.steelersgab.com/2009/12/25/galloway-to-see-action-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-12141 Stephen Rhodes Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:42:24 +0000 http://www.steelersgab.com/?p=2233#comment-12141 I'm like you, George. I think that there is more to the Limas Sweed situation than the team will tell anyone. Keep in mind that Sweed is unavailable due to a "non-football"-related matter. This kind of reminds me when the Eagles earlier this season rented Jeff Garcia for a couple weeks. I’m like you, George. I think that there is more to the Limas Sweed situation than the team will tell anyone. Keep in mind that Sweed is unavailable due to a “non-football”-related matter.

This kind of reminds me when the Eagles earlier this season rented Jeff Garcia for a couple weeks.

]]> By: DrGeorge http://www.steelersgab.com/2009/12/25/galloway-to-see-action-sunday/comment-page-1/#comment-12139 DrGeorge Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:42:03 +0000 http://www.steelersgab.com/?p=2233#comment-12139 Matt, I fail to see the logic of the Galloway acquisition, unless MacDonald was not available. But having acquired Galloway, why deactivate him in favor of an inexperienced rookie when two starters (Hines and Wallace) are hurting? In other words, if Galloway still has enough skills to warrant a contract, why would he not be used? Or conversely, if Grisham is that good, why hasn't he played? Does anyone know any factual basis for Arians' statement -- or is his comment merely a pre-game smoke screen for the Ravens' DC? Surely, the Ravens expect Galloway to play. Matt, I fail to see the logic of the Galloway acquisition, unless MacDonald was not available. But having acquired Galloway, why deactivate him in favor of an inexperienced rookie when two starters (Hines and Wallace) are hurting? In other words, if Galloway still has enough skills to warrant a contract, why would he not be used? Or conversely, if Grisham is that good, why hasn’t he played? Does anyone know any factual basis for Arians’ statement — or is his comment merely a pre-game smoke screen for the Ravens’ DC? Surely, the Ravens expect Galloway to play.

]]>